<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1482 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782014</link>
    <description>Cash deposited in a bank account was examined under section 68, with the assessee explaining that the receipts were from debtors against past sales and furnishing a party-wise bifurcation of the amounts received and the outstanding balances. As the revenue did not dispute those details and brought no contrary evidence on record, the explanation was accepted and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1482 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782014</link>
      <description>Cash deposited in a bank account was examined under section 68, with the assessee explaining that the receipts were from debtors against past sales and furnishing a party-wise bifurcation of the amounts received and the outstanding balances. As the revenue did not dispute those details and brought no contrary evidence on record, the explanation was accepted and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>