<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 224 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48153</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter to verify whether the assessee had actually availed depreciation on the capital goods. The Court clarified that Modvat credit is not allowable only when the assessee has actually availed depreciation on the capital goods. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed as no question of law arose from the impugned order, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 224 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48153</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter to verify whether the assessee had actually availed depreciation on the capital goods. The Court clarified that Modvat credit is not allowable only when the assessee has actually availed depreciation on the capital goods. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed as no question of law arose from the impugned order, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>