<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1503 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782035</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the disallowance made on account of differences between VAT returns and books of account. The Tribunal held that, under Gujarat VAT Rules, compulsory reversal of input tax credit on returned goods causes higher purchase returns in VAT records, while books can record only commercially accepted returns. As sales figures matched in both VAT returns and books and the difference in purchases was less than one percent, without any evidence of bogus or unverifiable purchases, the AO could not treat the variation as inflated purchases or suppressed income. The additions made without rejecting audited books were held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1503 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782035</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the disallowance made on account of differences between VAT returns and books of account. The Tribunal held that, under Gujarat VAT Rules, compulsory reversal of input tax credit on returned goods causes higher purchase returns in VAT records, while books can record only commercially accepted returns. As sales figures matched in both VAT returns and books and the difference in purchases was less than one percent, without any evidence of bogus or unverifiable purchases, the AO could not treat the variation as inflated purchases or suppressed income. The additions made without rejecting audited books were held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>