<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1512 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782044</link>
    <description>Non-resident sales commission was found not taxable in India because the revenue failed to establish a business connection, fixed place permanent establishment, or any basis for attributing profits to India, and the relevant services were performed outside India. Royalty income could not be assessed as business income under section 44DA because no permanent establishment in India was proved and no effective connection between the rights or property and any such establishment was shown. Penalty proceedings under section 271AA for alleged non-reporting in Form No. 3CEB were also unsustainable where the disputed transactions did not give rise to taxable income in India. The Tribunal deleted the additions and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1512 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782044</link>
      <description>Non-resident sales commission was found not taxable in India because the revenue failed to establish a business connection, fixed place permanent establishment, or any basis for attributing profits to India, and the relevant services were performed outside India. Royalty income could not be assessed as business income under section 44DA because no permanent establishment in India was proved and no effective connection between the rights or property and any such establishment was shown. Penalty proceedings under section 271AA for alleged non-reporting in Form No. 3CEB were also unsustainable where the disputed transactions did not give rise to taxable income in India. The Tribunal deleted the additions and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>