<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1518 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782050</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi-AT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the addition made on account of capital introduced in the business. The AO had doubted the source of capital allegedly arising from sale proceeds of agricultural land due to non-execution of registered sale deeds. ITAT held that duly executed agreements to sell, containing details of sellers, buyers, PAN, and photo identity, constituted plausible and sufficient explanation of the source, absent any contrary inquiry or rebuttal by the Revenue. The mere absence of registered sale deeds, particularly in the context of joint landholdings, was held insufficient to discredit the transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1518 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782050</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi-AT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the addition made on account of capital introduced in the business. The AO had doubted the source of capital allegedly arising from sale proceeds of agricultural land due to non-execution of registered sale deeds. ITAT held that duly executed agreements to sell, containing details of sellers, buyers, PAN, and photo identity, constituted plausible and sufficient explanation of the source, absent any contrary inquiry or rebuttal by the Revenue. The mere absence of registered sale deeds, particularly in the context of joint landholdings, was held insufficient to discredit the transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>