https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782064 HC held that the ex-parte order suffered from violation of principles of natural justice due to the petitioner-proprietor's medical condition, which prevented filing replies or attending personal hearings. Relying on a similar precedent, HC found that the matter should be heard on merits. However, since the petitioner-firm had been duly served and granted repeated opportunities, HC adopted a conditional approach. The impugned Order-in-Original was set aside subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to the Delhi High Court Bar Association within two weeks, after which the matter is to be reconsidered on merits. The petition was disposed of on these terms. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782064 HC held that the ex-parte order suffered from violation of principles of natural justice due to the petitioner-proprietor's medical condition, which prevented filing replies or attending personal hearings. Relying on a similar precedent, HC found that the matter should be heard on merits. However, since the petitioner-firm had been duly served and granted repeated opportunities, HC adopted a conditional approach. The impugned Order-in-Original was set aside subject to payment of costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to the Delhi High Court Bar Association within two weeks, after which the matter is to be reconsidered on merits. The petition was disposed of on these terms. Case-Laws GST Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782064