https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782066 HC dismissed the writ petition challenging attachment of the petitioner's bank account, observing concealment of material facts regarding the DGGI investigation and alleged fraudulent ITC availed. The court noted that the petitioner failed to disclose the ongoing investigation and related details despite having full knowledge. It held that the petitioner has an adequate remedy to file objections against the freezing order under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules and therefore did not warrant exercise of writ jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to be deposited within two weeks in the HC Staff Welfare Fund. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:57:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782066 HC dismissed the writ petition challenging attachment of the petitioner's bank account, observing concealment of material facts regarding the DGGI investigation and alleged fraudulent ITC availed. The court noted that the petitioner failed to disclose the ongoing investigation and related details despite having full knowledge. It held that the petitioner has an adequate remedy to file objections against the freezing order under Rule 159(5) of the CGST Rules and therefore did not warrant exercise of writ jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 1,00,000 to be deposited within two weeks in the HC Staff Welfare Fund. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782066