<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 2078 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464929</link>
    <description>Under the faceless assessment regime, a notice must be issued by the Faceless Assessment Officer, not by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Applying that view, the High Court found the impugned notice unsustainable and quashed it. The Court also left the parties&#039; rights and contentions open, including liberty to seek revival if the governing precedent is later reversed by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:52:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 2078 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464929</link>
      <description>Under the faceless assessment regime, a notice must be issued by the Faceless Assessment Officer, not by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Applying that view, the High Court found the impugned notice unsustainable and quashed it. The Court also left the parties&#039; rights and contentions open, including liberty to seek revival if the governing precedent is later reversed by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>