<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, allowing the manufacturer/exporter to claim a cash refund of accumulated modvat credit under specific circumstances outlined in Notification No. 85/87-C.E. The Tribunal clarified that the inability to utilize the credit due to changes in duty payment mechanisms qualifies for a refund, extending the scope beyond mere non-utilization. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the entitlement to cash refunds under Rule 96ZQ in cases where the credit could not be adjusted towards duty payments, particularly due to the introduction of a compounded levy scheme for textiles. The appeal was dismissed for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, allowing the manufacturer/exporter to claim a cash refund of accumulated modvat credit under specific circumstances outlined in Notification No. 85/87-C.E. The Tribunal clarified that the inability to utilize the credit due to changes in duty payment mechanisms qualifies for a refund, extending the scope beyond mere non-utilization. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the entitlement to cash refunds under Rule 96ZQ in cases where the credit could not be adjusted towards duty payments, particularly due to the introduction of a compounded levy scheme for textiles. The appeal was dismissed for lack of substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>