<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48136</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order for being cryptic and not considering the petitioner&#039;s detailed application, remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for a proper decision. The writ petition was allowed, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the application in accordance with the Court&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:06:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 92 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48136</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order for being cryptic and not considering the petitioner&#039;s detailed application, remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for a proper decision. The writ petition was allowed, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the application in accordance with the Court&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>