<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment u/s 147 void; India-UAE DTAA interest taxed correctly, no return needed under s.115A(5) and s.195</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94404</link>
    <description>The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated u/s 147 was without valid jurisdiction and therefore void. The assessee, a UAE tax resident foreign company, had only interest income from an Indian payer, on which tax had been duly withheld at 12.5% in accordance with Article 11 of the India-UAE DTAA and s.195. As the conditions of s.115A(5) were satisfied, the assessee was not obliged to file a return for AY 2012-13, rendering the AO&#039;s sole basis for reopening-non-filing of return-untenable. Further, the AO wrongly taxed double the actual interest income without supporting material. The reassessment order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment u/s 147 void; India-UAE DTAA interest taxed correctly, no return needed under s.115A(5) and s.195</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94404</link>
      <description>The ITAT held that the reassessment initiated u/s 147 was without valid jurisdiction and therefore void. The assessee, a UAE tax resident foreign company, had only interest income from an Indian payer, on which tax had been duly withheld at 12.5% in accordance with Article 11 of the India-UAE DTAA and s.195. As the conditions of s.115A(5) were satisfied, the assessee was not obliged to file a return for AY 2012-13, rendering the AO&#039;s sole basis for reopening-non-filing of return-untenable. Further, the AO wrongly taxed double the actual interest income without supporting material. The reassessment order was quashed and the assessee&#039;s appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>