<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1347 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781879</link>
    <description>NCLAT (Chennai) held that the principles of natural justice were violated when the NCLT (Bengaluru) decided a company petition on merits in the absence of counsel for the appellants, without passing any order to proceed ex parte or granting a specific ex parte hearing date. The Tribunal was required to ensure a fair opportunity of hearing even where no detailed procedure is prescribed. As this defect vitiated the proceedings, NCLAT allowed the appeal, quashed the impugned order dated 30.11.2022, and directed a fresh decision of the company petition by NCLT after hearing all parties, subject to the appellants depositing costs of Rs. 50,000 in the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund within 10 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1347 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781879</link>
      <description>NCLAT (Chennai) held that the principles of natural justice were violated when the NCLT (Bengaluru) decided a company petition on merits in the absence of counsel for the appellants, without passing any order to proceed ex parte or granting a specific ex parte hearing date. The Tribunal was required to ensure a fair opportunity of hearing even where no detailed procedure is prescribed. As this defect vitiated the proceedings, NCLAT allowed the appeal, quashed the impugned order dated 30.11.2022, and directed a fresh decision of the company petition by NCLT after hearing all parties, subject to the appellants depositing costs of Rs. 50,000 in the Prime Minister&#039;s Relief Fund within 10 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>