<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1350 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781882</link>
    <description>Penalty for non-compliance with summons was reduced where service of the show cause notice and final order was disputed and the appellant did not press the merits of the challenge. On those facts, the Tribunal held that the ends of justice would be met by limiting the monetary penalty, rather than maintaining the original amount. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs, granting partial relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1350 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781882</link>
      <description>Penalty for non-compliance with summons was reduced where service of the show cause notice and final order was disputed and the appellant did not press the merits of the challenge. On those facts, the Tribunal held that the ends of justice would be met by limiting the monetary penalty, rather than maintaining the original amount. The penalty was reduced from Rs. 5 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs, granting partial relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>