https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781884 The Tribunal considered whether SFIO was a necessary party to an appeal concerning SEBI's order and whether it could be impleaded because of its separate investigation. It noted that SEBI's impugned order rested on its own investigation under the SEBI Act, while SFIO's investigation proceeded under a different statutory framework and could, if completed, lead to a report to the Central Government and then prosecution before the designated court. Treating the two investigations as distinct, the Tribunal held that SFIO's presence was not required for adjudication of the appeal and rejected the impleadment request. en-us Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:40:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781884 The Tribunal considered whether SFIO was a necessary party to an appeal concerning SEBI's order and whether it could be impleaded because of its separate investigation. It noted that SEBI's impugned order rested on its own investigation under the SEBI Act, while SFIO's investigation proceeded under a different statutory framework and could, if completed, lead to a report to the Central Government and then prosecution before the designated court. Treating the two investigations as distinct, the Tribunal held that SFIO's presence was not required for adjudication of the appeal and rejected the impleadment request. Case-Laws SEBI Wed, 18 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781884