<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1353 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781885</link>
    <description>Independent directors were permitted to negotiate with proposed investors and place the material on record for further consideration despite an existing restraint on access to the securities market. The tribunal allowed this limited course so the proposed investment material could be examined before any further decision, and directed the matter to be listed on the next date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1353 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781885</link>
      <description>Independent directors were permitted to negotiate with proposed investors and place the material on record for further consideration despite an existing restraint on access to the securities market. The tribunal allowed this limited course so the proposed investment material could be examined before any further decision, and directed the matter to be listed on the next date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>