https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781906 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal of the importer against the order of absolute confiscation. It held that the goods in question had already been re-exported pursuant to a Let Export Order dated 7.10.2019, prior to the Revenue's appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and before the impugned order was passed. Since the goods were no longer available, and there was no case of clearance under bond, confiscation could not legally be ordered. The order of absolute confiscation was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781906 CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal of the importer against the order of absolute confiscation. It held that the goods in question had already been re-exported pursuant to a Let Export Order dated 7.10.2019, prior to the Revenue's appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) and before the impugned order was passed. Since the goods were no longer available, and there was no case of clearance under bond, confiscation could not legally be ordered. The order of absolute confiscation was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781906