https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781908 HC considered a writ petition seeking permission to re-export imported viscose knitted fabrics from China, which had been detained for a long period. Relying on its earlier decision in a similar matter, HC held that continuation of adjudication does not require retention of goods in India, as fine, penalty, and differential duty can be realized independently. To balance revenue interests and avoid undue hardship from prolonged detention, HC directed that the petitioner be allowed to re-export the goods, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions, and disposed of the petition. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781908 HC considered a writ petition seeking permission to re-export imported viscose knitted fabrics from China, which had been detained for a long period. Relying on its earlier decision in a similar matter, HC held that continuation of adjudication does not require retention of goods in India, as fine, penalty, and differential duty can be realized independently. To balance revenue interests and avoid undue hardship from prolonged detention, HC directed that the petitioner be allowed to re-export the goods, subject to satisfaction of specified conditions, and disposed of the petition. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781908