<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1409 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781941</link>
    <description>Severance compensation received on cessation of employment was treated as taxable profits in lieu of salary because it fell within the express scope of section 17(3)(iii), which covers amounts received from an employer or former employer after employment ends. The earlier view treating such compensation as a capital receipt was distinguished as applying to the pre-amendment position, while the post-01.04.2002 language of the provision materially widened the charge. As the payment was linked to termination of employment and there was no evidence that it was gratuitous or outside the employment nexus, the receipt was held taxable and not a capital receipt exempt from tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1409 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781941</link>
      <description>Severance compensation received on cessation of employment was treated as taxable profits in lieu of salary because it fell within the express scope of section 17(3)(iii), which covers amounts received from an employer or former employer after employment ends. The earlier view treating such compensation as a capital receipt was distinguished as applying to the pre-amendment position, while the post-01.04.2002 language of the provision materially widened the charge. As the payment was linked to termination of employment and there was no evidence that it was gratuitous or outside the employment nexus, the receipt was held taxable and not a capital receipt exempt from tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>