https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781948 HC held that the assessment order was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice and by invoking an incorrect provision. Though the petitioner delayed marginally in responding to notice u/s 143(2), a reply with annexures was filed, and further queries were raised by the Department. The final order, however, was passed u/s 143(3) r/w 144(b) instead of u/s 144, despite alleging non-cooperation. HC found the impugned order unsustainable, quashed it, and remitted the matter to the assessing authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with law, preferably within six months. en-us Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781948 HC held that the assessment order was vitiated by violation of principles of natural justice and by invoking an incorrect provision. Though the petitioner delayed marginally in responding to notice u/s 143(2), a reply with annexures was filed, and further queries were raised by the Department. The final order, however, was passed u/s 143(3) r/w 144(b) instead of u/s 144, despite alleging non-cooperation. HC found the impugned order unsustainable, quashed it, and remitted the matter to the assessing authority to pass fresh orders in accordance with law, preferably within six months. Case-Laws Income Tax Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781948