https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781956 HC held that where seized goods were found to belong to the consignor and were released to it, and no finding existed that the petitioner-transporter was engaged in purchase or sale of goods or in any tax evasion, proceedings against the transporter were unsustainable. The explanation that fewer goods were loaded due to human error of labourers negated any intent to evade tax by the transporter. In absence of adverse material against the transporter, seizure of the vehicle and continuation of proceedings were unjustified. The impugned order was quashed and the petition allowed. en-us Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781956 HC held that where seized goods were found to belong to the consignor and were released to it, and no finding existed that the petitioner-transporter was engaged in purchase or sale of goods or in any tax evasion, proceedings against the transporter were unsustainable. The explanation that fewer goods were loaded due to human error of labourers negated any intent to evade tax by the transporter. In absence of adverse material against the transporter, seizure of the vehicle and continuation of proceedings were unjustified. The impugned order was quashed and the petition allowed. Case-Laws GST Thu, 20 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781956