https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48123 The Court set aside the CESTAT's order allowing the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise (A)'s refund grant to the petitioner. The Court found that the Tribunal failed to consider the merits of the case and violated natural justice by not providing a proper hearing. Despite rejecting the natural justice argument, the Court remanded the matter back to CESTAT for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a proper review and hearing. The petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and both parties were granted the opportunity for a fair hearing. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48123 The Court set aside the CESTAT's order allowing the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner of Central Excise (A)'s refund grant to the petitioner. The Court found that the Tribunal failed to consider the merits of the case and violated natural justice by not providing a proper hearing. Despite rejecting the natural justice argument, the Court remanded the matter back to CESTAT for a fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for a proper review and hearing. The petition was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and both parties were granted the opportunity for a fair hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48123