<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 276 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48111</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana at Chandigarh dismissed a petition filed under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to a delay of 1494 days in filing the Reference Petition. The court found the delay to be a result of reckless and negligent behavior, rather than reasons beyond the petitioner&#039;s control. Emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the claim of pursuing another remedy in the High Court of Delhi, the court cited past cases where similar delays were not condoned. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the main petition based on the delay itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 276 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48111</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana at Chandigarh dismissed a petition filed under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to a delay of 1494 days in filing the Reference Petition. The court found the delay to be a result of reckless and negligent behavior, rather than reasons beyond the petitioner&#039;s control. Emphasizing the lack of evidence to support the claim of pursuing another remedy in the High Court of Delhi, the court cited past cases where similar delays were not condoned. Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the main petition based on the delay itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>