https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781812 AT upheld the provisional attachment order under PMLA, holding that appellants were involved in the predicate offences as revealed through FIRs and subsequent investigation/ECIR. The investigation showed they extorted money using muscle power, obtained land documents, manipulated revenue records, and sold properties, generating quantifiable proceeds of crime. Relying on SC's order in a related matter, AT held that a prima facie case of money laundering under Section 3 was made out, as appellants projected tainted money as untainted and concealed its source. Since appellants failed to prove lawful sources for property purchases, AT declined interference and dismissed the appeals. en-us Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:42:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781812 AT upheld the provisional attachment order under PMLA, holding that appellants were involved in the predicate offences as revealed through FIRs and subsequent investigation/ECIR. The investigation showed they extorted money using muscle power, obtained land documents, manipulated revenue records, and sold properties, generating quantifiable proceeds of crime. Relying on SC's order in a related matter, AT held that a prima facie case of money laundering under Section 3 was made out, as appellants projected tainted money as untainted and concealed its source. Since appellants failed to prove lawful sources for property purchases, AT declined interference and dismissed the appeals. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 16 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781812