<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1318 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781850</link>
    <description>Recording a satisfaction note is a mandatory jurisdictional precondition for initiating assessment proceedings against a person other than the searched person under Section 153C. The note may be recorded at the initiation of, during, or immediately after completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment. Recording it 22 months after that assessment was not immediate and undermined the requirement for expeditious and certain search assessments. Neither the pandemic nor implementation of the faceless assessment scheme justified the delay, as the searched person&#039;s assessment was completed during the pandemic and Sections 153A and 153C proceedings were outside that scheme. The Section 153C notices were therefore invalid and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1318 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781850</link>
      <description>Recording a satisfaction note is a mandatory jurisdictional precondition for initiating assessment proceedings against a person other than the searched person under Section 153C. The note may be recorded at the initiation of, during, or immediately after completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment. Recording it 22 months after that assessment was not immediate and undermined the requirement for expeditious and certain search assessments. Neither the pandemic nor implementation of the faceless assessment scheme justified the delay, as the searched person&#039;s assessment was completed during the pandemic and Sections 153A and 153C proceedings were outside that scheme. The Section 153C notices were therefore invalid and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>