<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1327 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781859</link>
    <description>Simultaneous GST show-cause notices relating to the same transaction require consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s existing reply under the statutory framework governing overlapping proceedings. Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and the earlier notice issued under the CGST regime were central to determining the proper handling of successive notices. The reply filed under Rule 142(4) of the CGST Rules was required to be considered, and the matter was to be decided in accordance with law within the stipulated period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 08:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1327 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781859</link>
      <description>Simultaneous GST show-cause notices relating to the same transaction require consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s existing reply under the statutory framework governing overlapping proceedings. Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act and the earlier notice issued under the CGST regime were central to determining the proper handling of successive notices. The reply filed under Rule 142(4) of the CGST Rules was required to be considered, and the matter was to be decided in accordance with law within the stipulated period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>