<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1844 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464889</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the finding that the assessee&#039;s purchases were bogus, noting failure to produce transport documents, proof of movement of goods, or a stock register. The Tribunal found no infirmity in applying an estimated profit rate of 12.5% on such purchases but directed the AO to grant credit for profit already embedded in disclosed sales corresponding to these purchases. The assessee must furnish the relevant year&#039;s profit rate, and the AO will recompute income after allowing such credit. In another year, due to lack of credible evidence, an 8% profit rate on purchases was upheld. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 13:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1844 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464889</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the finding that the assessee&#039;s purchases were bogus, noting failure to produce transport documents, proof of movement of goods, or a stock register. The Tribunal found no infirmity in applying an estimated profit rate of 12.5% on such purchases but directed the AO to grant credit for profit already embedded in disclosed sales corresponding to these purchases. The assessee must furnish the relevant year&#039;s profit rate, and the AO will recompute income after allowing such credit. In another year, due to lack of credible evidence, an 8% profit rate on purchases was upheld. The assessee&#039;s appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>