https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48085 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass an available statutory appeal or revision remedy unless interference is needed to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. The High Court found no jurisdictional error or abuse in the trial court's directions releasing only personal belongings and articles not forming part of the case property, and it noted that the recall application was dismissed because the original order had been passed in counsel's presence. The challenge therefore failed and the Section 482 petition was held not maintainable. en-us Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48085 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass an available statutory appeal or revision remedy unless interference is needed to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. The High Court found no jurisdictional error or abuse in the trial court's directions releasing only personal belongings and articles not forming part of the case property, and it noted that the recall application was dismissed because the original order had been passed in counsel's presence. The challenge therefore failed and the Section 482 petition was held not maintainable. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48085