https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48083 The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Settlement Commission's order, emphasizing the Madras High Court's jurisdiction due to the substantial cause of action. The Court highlighted the doctrine of "forum conveniens" and declined to exercise territorial jurisdiction. Regarding the legality of the Settlement Commission's order, the Court noted the special nature of the Commission and clarified that the doctrine of merger did not apply. The petitioner was advised to seek relief from the Madras High Court. en-us Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:40:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48083 The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Settlement Commission's order, emphasizing the Madras High Court's jurisdiction due to the substantial cause of action. The Court highlighted the doctrine of "forum conveniens" and declined to exercise territorial jurisdiction. Regarding the legality of the Settlement Commission's order, the Court noted the special nature of the Commission and clarified that the doctrine of merger did not apply. The petitioner was advised to seek relief from the Madras High Court. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48083