<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 172 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48077</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision on customs duty for imported Texturising Machines. The petitioners were required to pay the balance duty amount as they failed to export goods of equal value. The duty was settled at Rs. 33,17,545, and the court rejected the petitioners&#039; plea for CVD credit. The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that once customs liability is resolved, no further intervention is necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 172 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48077</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision on customs duty for imported Texturising Machines. The petitioners were required to pay the balance duty amount as they failed to export goods of equal value. The duty was settled at Rs. 33,17,545, and the court rejected the petitioners&#039; plea for CVD credit. The court dismissed the petition, emphasizing that once customs liability is resolved, no further intervention is necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>