<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Benefit of N/N. 52/2003-Cus upheld for 100% EOU even with wastage beyond SION, no duty/penalty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94333</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal of the 100% EOU, holding that the benefit of N/N. 52/2003-Cus applies to inputs used in manufacture even where wastage exceeds SION norms, provided the inputs are actually used in the production process and waste/scrap is duly cleared on payment of duty and not removed unauthorisedly. Relying on the interpretation of the non-obstante clause in the notification, the Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s view that excess wastage automatically attracted duty or penalty. It held that the Commissioner and the adjudicating authority had erred in demanding customs duty of Rs. 34,555/-, imposing penalty of Rs. 5,000/- and redemption fine of Rs. 20,000/-. All such demands and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was fully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Benefit of N/N. 52/2003-Cus upheld for 100% EOU even with wastage beyond SION, no duty/penalty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94333</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal of the 100% EOU, holding that the benefit of N/N. 52/2003-Cus applies to inputs used in manufacture even where wastage exceeds SION norms, provided the inputs are actually used in the production process and waste/scrap is duly cleared on payment of duty and not removed unauthorisedly. Relying on the interpretation of the non-obstante clause in the notification, the Tribunal rejected the Department&#039;s view that excess wastage automatically attracted duty or penalty. It held that the Commissioner and the adjudicating authority had erred in demanding customs duty of Rs. 34,555/-, imposing penalty of Rs. 5,000/- and redemption fine of Rs. 20,000/-. All such demands and penalties were set aside, and the appeal was fully allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>