https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781717 Revisional interference in a cheque dishonour matter is limited to testing legality, propriety, regularity, and perversity, and does not permit a fresh reappreciation of evidence. Admission of signatures on the cheques attracted the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the accused failed to rebut them with credible proof that the cheques were not issued for a legally enforceable debt. An unsupported blank-cheque defence, unproved allegations of forged documents, alleged lack of financial capacity, and a claimed breach of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act were found insufficient to displace liability under Section 138. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781717 Revisional interference in a cheque dishonour matter is limited to testing legality, propriety, regularity, and perversity, and does not permit a fresh reappreciation of evidence. Admission of signatures on the cheques attracted the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the accused failed to rebut them with credible proof that the cheques were not issued for a legally enforceable debt. An unsupported blank-cheque defence, unproved allegations of forged documents, alleged lack of financial capacity, and a claimed breach of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act were found insufficient to displace liability under Section 138. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781717