<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 303 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48073</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, remitting the matter to CEGAT for reconsideration regarding the classification of imported materials as consumables, the dominant ingredient test, and the relevance of the Board&#039;s Circular. The Court emphasized interpreting the term &quot;wholly&quot; in the Notification context and considering the cost and role of imported materials in manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 303 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48073</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, remitting the matter to CEGAT for reconsideration regarding the classification of imported materials as consumables, the dominant ingredient test, and the relevance of the Board&#039;s Circular. The Court emphasized interpreting the term &quot;wholly&quot; in the Notification context and considering the cost and role of imported materials in manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>