<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1192 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781724</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the order allowing the respondent CENVAT credit on sales commission and general services on which service tax was paid under reverse charge. Relying on Board Circular No. 943/4/2011-CX, the Tribunal held that input service definition covers services used for clearance up to the place of removal and specifically includes sales promotion, thus permitting credit on commission-based sales services. For general services, the adjudicating authority had established correlation with output services, and in the absence of contrary evidence, denial of credit was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1192 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781724</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the order allowing the respondent CENVAT credit on sales commission and general services on which service tax was paid under reverse charge. Relying on Board Circular No. 943/4/2011-CX, the Tribunal held that input service definition covers services used for clearance up to the place of removal and specifically includes sales promotion, thus permitting credit on commission-based sales services. For general services, the adjudicating authority had established correlation with output services, and in the absence of contrary evidence, denial of credit was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>