<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1193 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781725</link>
    <description>Railway receipts containing the particulars required under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 remained valid documents for taking Cenvat credit even before issuance of the final STTG certificate, so interest for the intervening period was unsustainable. Where the railway receipts were specifically linked through annexures to a consolidated STTG, credit could not be denied merely because the STTG was not issued individually in the appellant&#039;s name. The circular was held not to warrant a hyper-technical approach when the linkage was established, and the substantive credit demand and connected penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1193 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781725</link>
      <description>Railway receipts containing the particulars required under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 remained valid documents for taking Cenvat credit even before issuance of the final STTG certificate, so interest for the intervening period was unsustainable. Where the railway receipts were specifically linked through annexures to a consolidated STTG, credit could not be denied merely because the STTG was not issued individually in the appellant&#039;s name. The circular was held not to warrant a hyper-technical approach when the linkage was established, and the substantive credit demand and connected penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>