<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1196 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781728</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals were not pursued where the tax effect fell below the monetary threshold of Rs. 2 crores under the governing circular dated 06.08.2024, and the Court declined to examine the matter on merits for that reason. The challenge to the validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not adjudicated, with the legal question kept open for consideration in an appropriate case. The appeal was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1196 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781728</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals were not pursued where the tax effect fell below the monetary threshold of Rs. 2 crores under the governing circular dated 06.08.2024, and the Court declined to examine the matter on merits for that reason. The challenge to the validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was not adjudicated, with the legal question kept open for consideration in an appropriate case. The appeal was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>