<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1209 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781741</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal set aside the SEBI order restraining the appellant, a former Managing Director of a credit rating agency, from associating with any SEBI-registered intermediary. SAT held that SEBI&#039;s Whole Time Member had grossly misread and distorted the findings of the inquiry report by a former judge, which had categorically found no evidence of interference in the rating process or manipulation of AAA ratings. The Tribunal criticized SEBI&#039;s repeated proceedings as unjustified, causing undue reputational and financial harm to the appellant. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1209 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781741</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal set aside the SEBI order restraining the appellant, a former Managing Director of a credit rating agency, from associating with any SEBI-registered intermediary. SAT held that SEBI&#039;s Whole Time Member had grossly misread and distorted the findings of the inquiry report by a former judge, which had categorically found no evidence of interference in the rating process or manipulation of AAA ratings. The Tribunal criticized SEBI&#039;s repeated proceedings as unjustified, causing undue reputational and financial harm to the appellant. The appeal was allowed and the impugned order quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>