<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48071</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision classifying &#039;Capacitors&#039; as &#039;electronic goods&#039; eligible for a concessional tax rate, emphasizing the specific inclusion in the Electronic Commission&#039;s list. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s approach incorrect and justified the High Court&#039;s interference. The allegation of &#039;unjust enrichment&#039; was left for the Revenue to investigate independently, with the Court emphasizing any excess tax collected must be paid to the Government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 301 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48071</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision classifying &#039;Capacitors&#039; as &#039;electronic goods&#039; eligible for a concessional tax rate, emphasizing the specific inclusion in the Electronic Commission&#039;s list. The Court deemed the Tribunal&#039;s approach incorrect and justified the High Court&#039;s interference. The allegation of &#039;unjust enrichment&#039; was left for the Revenue to investigate independently, with the Court emphasizing any excess tax collected must be paid to the Government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>