https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781757 HC held that appeals from CESTAT are maintainable only on substantial questions of law and that the issue of re-testing of goods is a matter to be decided by CESTAT on merits, which had not been adequately addressed in the impugned orders. Noting the appellant's laxity in failing to file written submissions and repeatedly seeking adjournments, HC nevertheless permitted the appellant one more opportunity to appear before CESTAT and argue the appeal on merits after filing written submissions, subject to payment of Rs. 25,000 as costs. Petition disposed. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781757 HC held that appeals from CESTAT are maintainable only on substantial questions of law and that the issue of re-testing of goods is a matter to be decided by CESTAT on merits, which had not been adequately addressed in the impugned orders. Noting the appellant's laxity in failing to file written submissions and repeatedly seeking adjournments, HC nevertheless permitted the appellant one more opportunity to appear before CESTAT and argue the appeal on merits after filing written submissions, subject to payment of Rs. 25,000 as costs. Petition disposed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781757