https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781760 HC directed implementation of the order-in-appeal dated 3 March 2025, as the Department's challenge had already been dismissed by the Revisional Authority on 22 October 2025. The petitioner is entitled to release of the detained gold bangles and iPhones upon payment of amounts stipulated in the order-in-appeal. Considering the prolonged delay caused by multiple tiers of litigation, HC held that the petitioner cannot be saddled with warehousing charges and waived them in the specific circumstances. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of. en-us Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781760 HC directed implementation of the order-in-appeal dated 3 March 2025, as the Department's challenge had already been dismissed by the Revisional Authority on 22 October 2025. The petitioner is entitled to release of the detained gold bangles and iPhones upon payment of amounts stipulated in the order-in-appeal. Considering the prolonged delay caused by multiple tiers of litigation, HC held that the petitioner cannot be saddled with warehousing charges and waived them in the specific circumstances. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781760