<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1237 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781769</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding deletion of disallowance of long-term capital loss and addition under s.68. The Tribunal accepted that the assessee&#039;s sale of shares in a loss-making project company, whose hydel project had been terminated by the State, was a bona fide commercial decision, with share valuation supported by negative net worth and linked recovery of receivables. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection regarding another group entity&#039;s absence of capital gain/loss. For the s.68 issue, ITAT noted that the unsecured loan was received through proper banking channels from a corporate lender, comparable to discounted sale of NPAs, and sustained CIT(A)&#039;s deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1237 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781769</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding deletion of disallowance of long-term capital loss and addition under s.68. The Tribunal accepted that the assessee&#039;s sale of shares in a loss-making project company, whose hydel project had been terminated by the State, was a bona fide commercial decision, with share valuation supported by negative net worth and linked recovery of receivables. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection regarding another group entity&#039;s absence of capital gain/loss. For the s.68 issue, ITAT noted that the unsecured loan was received through proper banking channels from a corporate lender, comparable to discounted sale of NPAs, and sustained CIT(A)&#039;s deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>