<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 300 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48068</link>
    <description>SC held that revisional jurisdiction under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act should ordinarily be exercised within three years and in no case exceed five years, with the reasonable period to be determined from the statutory scheme. The High Court&#039;s application of this rule and reliance on binding precedents was upheld as not unreasonable or jurisdictionally erroneous. The appeal challenging the HC decision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 300 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48068</link>
      <description>SC held that revisional jurisdiction under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act should ordinarily be exercised within three years and in no case exceed five years, with the reasonable period to be determined from the statutory scheme. The High Court&#039;s application of this rule and reliance on binding precedents was upheld as not unreasonable or jurisdictionally erroneous. The appeal challenging the HC decision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>