<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1250 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781782</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld the TPO&#039;s rejection of additional comparables proposed by the assessee in the distribution segment, holding that inclusion of companies not appearing in either the assessee&#039;s TP study accept-reject matrix or the TPO&#039;s search metrics would amount to impermissible cherry-picking and undermine comparability analysis. On the TP adjustment for interest on overdue receivables from AE, ITAT rejected the assessee&#039;s plea for netting such receivables against outstanding payables, holding that, in light of the retrospective amendment, delayed receivables constitute a separate international transaction requiring independent benchmarking. The tribunal also held that the assessee being debt-free is no ground to avoid charging arm&#039;s length interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1250 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781782</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld the TPO&#039;s rejection of additional comparables proposed by the assessee in the distribution segment, holding that inclusion of companies not appearing in either the assessee&#039;s TP study accept-reject matrix or the TPO&#039;s search metrics would amount to impermissible cherry-picking and undermine comparability analysis. On the TP adjustment for interest on overdue receivables from AE, ITAT rejected the assessee&#039;s plea for netting such receivables against outstanding payables, holding that, in light of the retrospective amendment, delayed receivables constitute a separate international transaction requiring independent benchmarking. The tribunal also held that the assessee being debt-free is no ground to avoid charging arm&#039;s length interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>