https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781795 HC held that the petitioner had committed a bona fide error by uploading an incorrect GSTIN in GSTR-1, which prevented the concerned recipient from availing ITC. Relying on Bombay HC decisions permitting rectification where no revenue loss occurs, HC directed respondent authorities (R-1 to R-3) to allow the petitioner to amend GSTR-1 within four weeks of receiving the order. All disputes and rival contentions between the petitioner and private respondents (R-4 and R-5) were kept open. The petition was allowed in part with these directions. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781795 HC held that the petitioner had committed a bona fide error by uploading an incorrect GSTIN in GSTR-1, which prevented the concerned recipient from availing ITC. Relying on Bombay HC decisions permitting rectification where no revenue loss occurs, HC directed respondent authorities (R-1 to R-3) to allow the petitioner to amend GSTR-1 within four weeks of receiving the order. All disputes and rival contentions between the petitioner and private respondents (R-4 and R-5) were kept open. The petition was allowed in part with these directions. Case-Laws GST Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781795