<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 1271 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781803</link>
    <description>Suspension of a government servant under the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 was found unsustainable where an adverse verification report had already been obtained and relied upon by the competent authority before the alleged loss to revenue. The alleged fraudulent input tax credit claim arose after that report had been considered in the show cause process, so the suspension lacked sufficient factual basis. The order was therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:42:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 1271 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781803</link>
      <description>Suspension of a government servant under the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 was found unsustainable where an adverse verification report had already been obtained and relied upon by the competent authority before the alleged loss to revenue. The alleged fraudulent input tax credit claim arose after that report had been considered in the show cause process, so the suspension lacked sufficient factual basis. The order was therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=781803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>