<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1334 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464867</link>
    <description>Services of foreign architects or engineers used for design work are liable to service tax under reverse charge, and the corresponding CENVAT credit may be available immediately. On that basis, the text states that the matter was treated as revenue neutral. Applying the principle in Jet Airways, it says the extended period of limitation was not invokable in a revenue-neutral case, so the demand was time-barred and penalties were not imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:57:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1334 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464867</link>
      <description>Services of foreign architects or engineers used for design work are liable to service tax under reverse charge, and the corresponding CENVAT credit may be available immediately. On that basis, the text states that the matter was treated as revenue neutral. Applying the principle in Jet Airways, it says the extended period of limitation was not invokable in a revenue-neutral case, so the demand was time-barred and penalties were not imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>