https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48058 The Court directed the respondents to deposit the amount and show cause why contempt of court action should not be initiated for wilful disobedience of encashing a bank guarantee before the appeal period expiry, contrary to the law laid down by the High Court. The respondents deposited the amount, tendered an unconditional apology, and assured future compliance. The show cause notice was discharged, and the petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, emphasizing compliance with High Court directions to avoid contempt and uphold the court's authority. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48058 The Court directed the respondents to deposit the amount and show cause why contempt of court action should not be initiated for wilful disobedience of encashing a bank guarantee before the appeal period expiry, contrary to the law laid down by the High Court. The respondents deposited the amount, tendered an unconditional apology, and assured future compliance. The show cause notice was discharged, and the petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, emphasizing compliance with High Court directions to avoid contempt and uphold the court's authority. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48058