<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 219 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48052</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the first appellate judge&#039;s decision to acquit the accused based on their exemption from Central Excise duty under Notification No. 119/75. The court found that since the notification came into force after the alleged offenses, the accused could benefit from it. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the acquittal, with a clarification that the judgment would not affect ongoing departmental proceedings against the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=86568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 219 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48052</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the first appellate judge&#039;s decision to acquit the accused based on their exemption from Central Excise duty under Notification No. 119/75. The court found that since the notification came into force after the alleged offenses, the accused could benefit from it. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the acquittal, with a clarification that the judgment would not affect ongoing departmental proceedings against the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>