<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payment of terminal handling charges and other charges directly to terminal operators instead of the shipping line- Kerala High Court quashed directions issued by the Ministry of Commerce</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15428</link>
    <description>A Public Notice permitted certain importers to pay terminal handling and related port charges directly to terminal operators as an optional payment facility; such administrative clarifications cannot create regulatory authority to override statutes or private contracts. Executive communications purporting to prevent shipping lines from collecting charges beyond port-prescribed terminal handling charges were treated as lacking statutory or contractual basis and as functionally interfering with freedom of contract and rights, because the Notice only offered an optional direct-payment mechanism and did not authorize alteration of existing contractual terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:53:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:53:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payment of terminal handling charges and other charges directly to terminal operators instead of the shipping line- Kerala High Court quashed directions issued by the Ministry of Commerce</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15428</link>
      <description>A Public Notice permitted certain importers to pay terminal handling and related port charges directly to terminal operators as an optional payment facility; such administrative clarifications cannot create regulatory authority to override statutes or private contracts. Executive communications purporting to prevent shipping lines from collecting charges beyond port-prescribed terminal handling charges were treated as lacking statutory or contractual basis and as functionally interfering with freedom of contract and rights, because the Notice only offered an optional direct-payment mechanism and did not authorize alteration of existing contractual terms.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:53:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=15428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>