<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal allowed: e-rickshaws treated as parts, not complete imports; penalties, confiscation and extended limitation invocation quashed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94293</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order dated 20.08.2020. The Tribunal held the adjudicating authority erred procedurally by relying on a chartered engineer&#039;s report without allowing cross-examination, and there was no admissible evidence that the appellant imported complete CKD/SKD e-rickshaws; therefore classification as parts only (CTH 8708) stood. The invocation of extended limitation failed for want of a finding of deliberate suppression to evade duty. Consequential findings of confiscation and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act (including on the appellant&#039;s MD and the CHA and its G-card holder) were unsustainable and were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal allowed: e-rickshaws treated as parts, not complete imports; penalties, confiscation and extended limitation invocation quashed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94293</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order dated 20.08.2020. The Tribunal held the adjudicating authority erred procedurally by relying on a chartered engineer&#039;s report without allowing cross-examination, and there was no admissible evidence that the appellant imported complete CKD/SKD e-rickshaws; therefore classification as parts only (CTH 8708) stood. The invocation of extended limitation failed for want of a finding of deliberate suppression to evade duty. Consequential findings of confiscation and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act (including on the appellant&#039;s MD and the CHA and its G-card holder) were unsustainable and were quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>