<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported quicklime lump reclassified to Customs Tariff Item 2522.1000; 98% CaO threshold excludes 2825.9090, assessment upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94291</link>
    <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders, holding that the imported quicklime (lump form) is correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2522.1000 as claimed by the appellant-assessee. Relying on the Tribunal&#039;s prior decision and material facts, the Bench found the CaO purity in the consignments to be below 98%, thereby excluding them from Chapter sub-heading 2825.9090 which covers CaO of 98% purity or more. In absence of contrary evidence from Revenue, the reclassification to 2825.9090 was rejected and the original assessment under 2522.1000 was upheld, with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=865616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported quicklime lump reclassified to Customs Tariff Item 2522.1000; 98% CaO threshold excludes 2825.9090, assessment upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94291</link>
      <description>CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned orders, holding that the imported quicklime (lump form) is correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Item 2522.1000 as claimed by the appellant-assessee. Relying on the Tribunal&#039;s prior decision and material facts, the Bench found the CaO purity in the consignments to be below 98%, thereby excluding them from Chapter sub-heading 2825.9090 which covers CaO of 98% purity or more. In absence of contrary evidence from Revenue, the reclassification to 2825.9090 was rejected and the original assessment under 2522.1000 was upheld, with consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:52:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>